Jan 28, 2013 4:00pm PST
in unison. let me end on a fun topic. scott brown. scott brown might run for senate. he's leading in the polls. and if they have that contest in markos moulitsas, senator kerry went over to the state department. so he's tweeting about this over the weekend and he's saying about his possible run. like he's getting ready to make an announcement. he then people give him grief, as they usually do on twitter. then i says, whatever, michael whatever, bud. then the third one. whatever. i think there was a song about this. then people think he's drunk tweeting because by the end he says you're brilliant matt. whatever. what is that? a, first of all, drunk tweeting, yes or no. >> probably, and you know what, i kind of like. i wish i could vote for him based on this alone. >> cenk: you don't want to. >> i know, i know. >> cenk: he gave away $19 billion from the banks. >> you like realness from these guys. if no one ripped him off yet then there is realness to it. >> cenk: no, he deleted it in a panic. >> he did delete them but at least he didn't say he got hacked. that's usually the go-to m
Jan 21, 2013 4:00pm PST
jackson hermela and mo brown jarvis from jack and jill is joining us through slightly. lupe fiasco was invited to perform one of his songs. apparently they didn't like that. here's what he says in the sponge. ♪ limb limbaugh is a racist ♪ glenn beck is a racist ♪ gaza strip was getting bombed ♪ obama didn't say [ bleep ] ♪ >> apparently lupe is not a fan of the president. here is a tweet that the sponsors wrote. disappointed that an artist took an opportunity to use an event celebrating invasion and startups to make political statement. isn't that what the inauguration inauguration is, a political moment. let's get start with whether lupe was right or wrong. hehe repeat the song for 30 or 40 seconds. >> it does not sound like a fun concert, but he was the featured artist. my question is who did they think they were booking. >> all they had to do was google the name and all these articles will come up. >> cenk: our interview would have come up. >> that would have come up. i like--i think he makes some valid points, but his approach is just always wrong. he means well, but
Jan 23, 2013 8:00pm PST
with a gooey center toasted up all golden brown then given a delicious design? a toaster strudel. pillsbury toaster strudel. so delicious...so fun.
Jan 24, 2013 4:00pm PST
brown would charge a rape victim who ended her pregnancy with tampering with evidence. that's seems unbelievable. >> i read about this this morning. i was blown away by it, too. it's one of the odder and more extreme bills that i've seen since i've been covering these reproductive rights issues. she said what i meant with this bill is to deter rapists it's to say that you can't rape a woman and then force her to have an abortion, because that's going to be tampering with the evidence. that's not what the bill says. the bill says that having an abortion is tampering with evidence and is a third degree felony. if a woman does it, if a rapist forces her to do it, which i don't see that happening very often, the woman would be thrown in jail for three years. the fact is that having an abortion i guess not tampering with evidence, i mean, to get graphic here, even if the fetus has been abarted it can still be used in evidence as the same way a fetus still growing could. the legislation makes no sense on any logical level at all. >> cenk: i'm not buying it. i think what she tried to do he